it’s chuck asay time!

27 Oct

Chuck’s point: Barack Obama wants to kill your baby.

My least favorite political cartoonist of all time has to be Chuck Asay.  It’s not just that I disagree with his politics.  It’s not just that I can’t stand his “things aren’t the way they used’ta be, you betcha” style.  It’s not just that he’s one of those people who, the more wrong they are, the more smug they become.  It’s not just that he’s less a cartoonist and more a polemicist.  It’s not just that I hate his retro drawing style.  It’s all these things combined.  He is a perfect storm of toolbaggery.

Now, you could easily say that about someone like Tom Tomorrow (on the left end of the spectrum), except that Tom has an interesting retro drawing style, a much sharper wit, and a slightly firmer grasp on the way the world actually seems to work.  Republicans may always be the butt of the joke in This Modern World (Tom’s strip), but he’s better at pinning down exactly what it is that makes them laughable.  There’s plenty to laugh at on the left, too, but Asay’s point isn’t to make you laugh.  He doesn’t even seem to be trying to change your mind, or even make you think.  The point of a Chuck Asay cartoon seems to be to make conservatives shake their head and go “tut-tut” at those naughty liberals ruining everything, and to make liberals go “wait, what? no, that’s… wha-huh?

Case in point: this cartoon right here.   Let’s break this down: there’s obviously two black women here, except that one of them is carrying a pure white infant in her belly.  The kid’s nearly fully formed, so we can assume that the younger woman fully intends to carry her Aryan love child to term.  Perhaps she’s a surrogate mother, which would explain why the child looks absolutely nothing like her.   Thing is, she’s obviously going to give birth to this kid.

The older woman is supposed to look like one of those hectoring, interfering liberals, who are always trying to tell you what to do with your life and who natter on about silly things like “health care” and “rights.”  She’s telling the young woman to vote as if her life depended on it.  The kid inside her thinks “Actually, mine does.”

Why, Chuck?  Are you saying that if this young woman votes for Obama, the kid will die?  Will she all of a sudden decide to have a late-term abortion because she voted for a Democrat?  If the older woman’s argument is “young women should vote, because their health is at stake,” is Chuck Asay’s argument “young women shouldn’t vote, because white babies will die?”  ‘Cuz that’s how I read this thing.

You could, conceivably, see this cartoon as a perfectly respectable depiction of America as an evolving Democracy: how the votes we cast today will affect the lives of our children tomorrow.  I’m down with that.  You could even say that it’s a perfectly legitimate expression of a pro-life point of view, and that the young woman in fact represents all women in her particular situation.  That’s fine.  It’s still implied that merely allowing her to vote endangers the life of her unborn child somehow, and it seems to stem from the bizarre idea that liberal women run around having abortions willy-nilly (otherwise, why would this kid’s life necessarily be in danger?) but we’ll let it slide.

Unfortunately, Chuck’s gone and pasted a bunch of buttons all over the older woman saying things like “NOW”(boo!) and “OBAMA” (hiss!) and – gasp!ACORN!

Er….. Acorn?

Acorn’s a voting rights group that recently got into trouble.  Some of their employees, needing to fill their daily quota of registered voters, filled out registration cards for people like “Mickey Mouse” and “Betty Boop.”  Essentially, Acorn’s only real crime is not double-checking their homework before passing it in, but talk radio’s been all over this for weeks.  You know, because a couple of bogus names on the voter rolls are a lot worse than Diebold machines that intentionally cast the wrong vote, or telling people in downtown Cleveland to vote on the wrong day – both of which are tactics Republican operatives actually used in the last election.  Oh, and Barack Obama once defended them in court back in the ’90s, and hired them during the primaries to “get-out-the-vote.” In Talk-Radio-Land, this means he was totally their BFF.

Acorn, as a group of community activists, is obivously more likely to lean more towards the labor union/”power to the people” end of the spectrum, which is why your average corporatist Republican tends not to like them very much.   The only way Acorn’s recent actions could be in any way dangerous is if the dead people they falsely registered actually came back from the grave, because zombies are always bad news.  Or, I guess, people might try to vote in multiple precincts under different names, except that a) under the Help America Vote Act you’re apparently not allowed to vote unless you have seven forms of ID and a letter from your 6th grade Math teacher, and b) people have been doing this sort of thing for years, on both sides of the aisle.

If you’re Chuck Asay’s target audience, though, all you need to know is ACORN LIBERAL BAAAAD! Despite their years of service in working class, urban neighborhoods, at the end of the day Acorn’s just another one of those craaaazy liberal organizations that wants you to vote Obama, get gay married to a monkey, convert to witchcraft, and murder your children.

(Note: to be fair to Mr. Asay, some of his recent cartoons on the bailout have been spot-on. )


Posted by on October 27, 2008 in Uncategorized


3 responses to “it’s chuck asay time!

  1. fever2tell

    October 27, 2008 at 9:47 pm

    Supposed to look black? I also thought they were supposed to look like those butch looking 70s style feminists that hate Sarah Palin “just cuz she’s pretty”. Because obviously all liberal women are angry butch baby haters. None of us have kids ourselves or have dedicated our careers to helping disadvantaged children. No siree.

    All of these people who preach about a ‘culture of life”, should be required to foster a disadvantaged child or go volunteer in a low income school system so they can actually see the kind of suffering that children who are born into abusive situations or who’s parents are drug addicts, mentally ill or othwerwise unfit to parent live through every day. Many of these children suffer under circumstances a person with a normal upbringing can’t even begin to fathom, and there will be no miracle and no prayer that can possibly save them from their circumstances. Go adopt a couple of those kids and rehabilitate them before you tell me poor women shouldn’t get cheap birth control and rape victims shouldn’t get plan B.

    I’m so tired of people personifying women’s organizations like NOW and planned parenthood as pure baby killing businesses. I hear that there are protests against PP going on all over the country right now, and the ironic thing is that they are even protesting clinics that don’t provide abortion services. That’s like going down to the PP Express in Davis Square and harassing women who go in there to get their guardasil vaccine… a totally worthless exercise in self rightgeousness.

    If you want to see something else in the same vein that will really make you slap your head in dismay, go onto you tube and check out the vid of Elizabth Hassleback introducing Sarah Plain at a rally and telling the crowd that Palin is a champion of women because she’s, “Protecting the rights of the unbron daughters of America.” Puke. The only thing I like about her is the fact that her ignorant ass is on the View every day getting schooled by Barbara Walters, and the whole country can see how stupid she looks.

  2. JLRoberson

    August 24, 2009 at 2:43 am

    If they’re not supposed to be black, then why does Asay have all these lines all over their faces that, to almost anyone on earth, indicate shading? Asay is, as much as I hate him, a technically skilled artist, and he never, ever draws people like this unless he means them to BE black.

    I never saw this one and now I find him more troubling than before, because indeed it does appear to be a white baby in the woman’s body. The message this writer is reading into it is a valid one, though Asay is usually so confused it’s hard to say what he meant. My assumption with Asay is that he simply gets a list of talking points for the week and dutifully illustrates them, using the easiest tropes his experience has taught him, without any thought at all.

    I find Asay most troubling because he couches all this in a seemingly friendly, warm style that puts a happy face on some of the vilest ideas the GOP comes up with, and makes it easier for his audience(which I assume are seniors like himself) to accept them, which is why Slate keeps him(that and Cagle is a right-winger himself, who, if there were more con cartoonists, would probably have nothing but) rather than, say,’s obviously poisonous Bob Lang, who otherwise is no different, except that he has a style that is off-putting and ugly.

    He’s like the real-life version of “Kelly,” the fake cartoonist at the Onion portrayed by the skilled left-wing cartoonist Ward Sutton.

  3. MarcJ

    January 27, 2011 at 5:13 am

    Urgh, another Asay cartoon. The man really ought to retire somewhere where he can’t bother us anymore, although god help the other inhabitants of any old age home that has Asay muttering in a corner about those darn Liberal kids.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: